Ruffa
Ruffa v. Southern California Edison Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LYLE RUFFA, No. 1:22-cv-01556-ADA-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AS
v. MOOT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (ECF Nos. 9, 10) COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Kenneth Lyle Ruffa (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint on December 2, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on January 17, 2023, but have not yet answered the Complaint. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 12.) On February 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss, explaining that the FAC renders the original complaint inoperative and Defendants’ motions to dismiss moot pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 16 at 2.) Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil…