(PC) Dawson v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20232:21-cv-00510California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON, No. 2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 19, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff received several extensions of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF Nos. 26, 29, 30), but has not done so. The day after the findings and recommendations were issued, plaintiff filed another motion for temporary restraining order reiterating his claims. ECF No. 20. The court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.