Trate

(HC) Blanc v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20231:22-cv-01192California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUKNER BLANC, Case No. 1:22-cv-01192-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST TO STAY PENDING SUPREME

v. COURT RESOLUTION OF JONES V.

HENDRIX

B.M. TRATE,

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Respondent. (ECF No. 1) 12 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has requested that the Court hold his petition in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides Jones v. Hendrix, No. 21-857. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Respondent joins in Petitioner’s motion to stay as it “serves the objectives of efficiency and preserves judicial resources.” (ECF No. 11 at 2.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s request for a stay of proceedings (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED; 2. Within THIRTY (30) days after the Supreme Court issues its decision in Jones v. Hendrix, No. 21-857, Petitioner may file a Supplement to the Petition; 3. Within SIXTY (60) days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.