Hearden

Hearden v. Windsor Redding Care Center LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20232:22-cv-00994California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NANCY HEARDEN, et al., No. 2:22-cv-00994-MCE-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WINDSOR REDDING CARE CENTER, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 31, 2023, this Court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and determined that Plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs associated with removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). See ECF No. 28, at 5–6. In compliance with this Court’s order, Plaintiffs’ counsel timely filed declarations setting forth their proposed attorneys’ fees: Attorney Richard Frankel (40 years’ experience): 12 hours x $800 = $9,600 Attorney Wendy York (29 years’ experience): 6 hours x $850 = $5,100 Attorney Stuart C. Talley (28 years’ experience): 3.5 hours x $825 = $2,887.50 Attorney Daniel Jay (21 years’ experience): 15.9 hours x $500 = $7,950 Total: $25,537.50 (37.4 hours) /// See ECF No. 29, at 3, 7, 11, 20. Defendants have filed an opposition brief. ECF No. 32. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.