Fernandez

(PC) Broadnax v. Fernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20231:22-cv-01223California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COTTRELL BROADNAX, 1:22-cv-01223-JLT-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR vs. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER FERNANDEZ, et al., (ECF No. 24.) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

21 Cottrell Broadnax (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 21, 2022, the court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis due to a balance of $945.66 in his prison trust account, thus requiring Plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action in full within thirty days. (ECF No. 24.) The thirty-day time period has now expired and Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.