Pierce

(PC) Brashear v. Pierce

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20232:22-cv-00902California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS K. BRASHEAR, No. 2:22-cv-00902-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. PIERCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 24, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.