Solorano

(PC) Baker v. Solorano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20232:22-cv-01096California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILLARD WAYNE BAKER, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-01096-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING THE DECEMBER 22, 2022 FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE AN

SOLORANO, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. ECF No. 24 16 17 On December 22, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that it stated cognizable Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against defendants Solorano, Morris, and six Doe defendants. ECF No. 14. I also recommended that plaintiff’s denial of medical care claim against the seventh Doe defendant be dismissed as unrelated. Id. Plaintiff has since filed a motion asking the court to invoke supplemental jurisdiction over state law tort claims. ECF No. 24. In light of plaintiff’s motion, I will vacate my December 22 findings and recommendations and allow plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint that includes his state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.