Lampkin
Lampkin v. Spangner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRISHKA LAMPKIN, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-01204-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE DENIED COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ECF No. 49 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 Plaintiffs Trishka Lampkin and her son, Robert Cortez, commenced this action against defendants County of Sacramento and Martha Spagner for disclosing plaintiff Lampkin’s address to her former partner and abuser, defendant Matthew Cortez. ECF No. 1. This matter is now before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against defendant Cortez. ECF No. 49. I recommend that their motion be denied. Background Plaintiffs allege that defendant Spagner—a deputy clerk for the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento, see ECF No. 26 at 2—inadvertently divulged Lampkin’s address to defendant Matthew Cortez. ECF…