Castrejon

Gilbert v. Castrejon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20231:22-cv-00319California2,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

18 Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) filed this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and state law. (Doc. 1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. 22.) No opposition to the motion has been filed. (See Docket.) This matter has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on March 8, 2023, will be vacated. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s unopposed motion will be granted. The Court will also order Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim 1 Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action against Gabriel Castrejon, doing business as El Marisquero (“Castrejon”); Ignacio Castrejon Alvarez (“Alvarez”), doing business as El Marisquero; and Guaranty Holdings of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.