Perez

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20231:19-cv-00400California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-JLT-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS R. PEREZ

v. AND MALDONADO SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

R. PEREZ, et al., TO EFFECT SERVICE

Defendants. (ECF No. 26.)

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

21 I. BACKGROUND Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, filed December 13, 2021, against defendants R. Perez, L. Munoz, C. Sims, and Maldonado for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 43.) On February 17, 2022, the Court found service of the Third Amended Complaint appropriate and directed e-service on all of the Defendants in this case (ECF No. 44.) II. SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.