Prasad

(PC) Hill v. Prasad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20232:21-cv-01727California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California TYLER V. HEATH, State Bar No. 271478 Supervising Deputy Attorney General GARRETT L. SEUELL, State Bar No. 323175 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-6144 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Garrett.Seuell@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Prasad, Tapia, and Read 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 CYMEYON HILL, 2:21-cv-1727 KJN 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 v. 16 DR. PRASAD, et al., Defendants. 19 On February 22, 2023, defendants Prasad, Tapia and Read requested an order modifying the January 11, 2023 order setting the deadline to file pretrial motions. Such order granted defendants until February 27, 2023, to file pretrial motions. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.