Sherman

(PC) Wilson v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20231:22-cv-00874California528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00874 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING CONCLUSION OF

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DENY MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 15)

Defendants.

David W. Wilson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 19, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff was afforded 14 days within which to file objections. (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff filed objections on February 8, 2023. (Doc. 17.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Plaintiff’s assertions are not entirely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.