Withrow

(PC) Bradford v. Withrow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20232:23-cv-00223California1,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:23-cv-0223 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS &RECOMMENDATIONS PATRICK WITHROW, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, currently housed at California State Prison, Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”). Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. §1915. However, as discussed below, court records confirm that plaintiff is not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis; thus, he must pay the court’s filing fee in full to proceed with this action. Section 1915(g) A prisoner may not proceed in forma pauperis: if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.