Ullery

(PC) Turner v. Ullery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20232:22-cv-00002California1,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:22-cv-0002 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL ULLERY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Several matters are pending. Motion to Accommodate First, on January 9, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to accommodate people with disabilities. While not entirely clear, it appears plaintiff wants the court to adopt certain rules an unidentified municipal court applies to accommodate people with disabilities to participate in court business as parties or witnesses, the majority of which apply to court hearings. (ECF No. 64.) However, in this court, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), all motions in prisoner cases are submitted on the papers. Thus, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s motion is not relevant and is denied. Should plaintiff need special accommodation in connection with a court hearing in the future, he may seek court relief at that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.