(PC)Henderson

(PC)Henderson v. Hailie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20232:21-cv-00790California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HERBERT HENDERSON, Case No. 2:21-cv-0790 WBS KJN P 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY v. SCHEDULING ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO FILE TWO

SUCCESSIVE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

DR. HAILIE, AND TO VACATE DISPOSITIVE

MOTION DUE DATE

Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner. Defendant B. Haile moved this Court to modify the scheduling order to allow her to file two successive dispositive motions. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.