Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 2:19-cv-02579-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ALI, et al., THIS ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S

Defendants. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. Nos. 122, 123, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131, 169, 170)

18 Plaintiff Carl Foust is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 12, 2022, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s only remaining claim asserted in the operative second amended complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. No. 127.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition brief to defendant’s motion to dismiss within the time allowed for under the Local Rules. …