Haro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMADO HARO and ROCHELLE No. 1:21-cv-00239-ADA-SKO ORTEGA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiffs, THAT PLAINIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

BE DENIED, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

v. CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF

FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION BE

WALMART, INC., GRANTED, AND RECOMMENDING

PLAINIFFS’ PROPOSED COLLECTIVE

Defendant. ACTION NOTICE PLAN BE APPROVED

IN PART

17 (Docs. 41, 44, 70) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiffs Amado Haro and Rochelle Ortega (“Plaintiffs”)’s motion for conditional certification of collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Doc. 41), proposed collective action notice plan (Doc. 44), and motion to strike employee declarations submitted by Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”) (Doc. 70). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that…