Jackson v. City of Modesto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20231:21-cv-00415California2,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ESTATE OF KIM JACKSON, et al., CASE NO. 1:21-CV-0415 AWI EPG

Plaintiffs

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

v. STRIKE

CITY OF MODESTO and GALEN CARROLL, (Doc. No. 44) 11 Defendants 12 13 This case stems from a fatal encounter between decedent Kim Jackson (“Jackson”) and members of the Modesto Police Department (“MPD”). Plaintiffs are Jackson’s Estate and her family members. Following prior Rule 12(b) motions, the only remaining defendants are the City of Modesto (“the City”) and former Modest Police Chief Galen Carroll (“Carroll”). Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Rule 12(f) motion to strike Defendants’ second affirmative defense, which invokes discretionary act immunity under Cal. Gov. Code § 820.2 and derivative immunity under Cal. Gov. Code § 815.2. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. 21 GENERAL BACKGROUND1 On October 8, 2016, Jackson was 52 years old and suffered from mental health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.