(PC) Hunter v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:22-cv-01282California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, No. 2:22-cv-01282-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROLLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in the Sacramento County Main Jail. He proceeds without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2023, the court informed plaintiff that he could proceed with potentially-cognizable claims for deprivation of out-of-cell time against defendants Rolland, Calp, Bliss, Haw, Galvez, Ayers, Traxler, Minor, Sacramento County, Biagi, and Ahlers or he could file a second amended complaint in an effort to also state additional claims including a claim against defendant Kibak. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has elected not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claims identified by the court. ECF No. 14. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.