Bradley-Aboyade

Bradley-Aboyade v. Crozier

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:19-cv-01098California2,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TARYN BRADLEY-ABOYADE, No. 2:19-cv-01098-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER OFFICER D. CROZIER, et al., Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants D. Crozier (“Crozier”), D. Hatch (“Hatch”), R. Salas (“Salas”), and G. Schopf’s (“Schopf”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff Taryn Bradley-Aboyade (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 50), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 52). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from the death of Wayne Benjamin Bradley (“Decedent”) while he was in custody at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”). (ECF No. 45 at 2.) Plaintiff, Decedent’s surviving daughter, brings this action against multiple individuals, including as relevant here, Officers Crozier, Hatch, Salas, and Schopf under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.