Jenkins

(PC) Gosztyla v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:22-cv-01706California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-01706-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. JENKINS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 28, 2022, the court entered a screening order that informed plaintiff that he could proceed with potentially cognizable claims against defendants Jenkins or he could file an amended complaint in an effort to also state a claim against defendants Coker, Costa, Cantu, Holmes, Covello, and Rojas. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff elected not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claims identified by the court. ECF No. 10. Accordingly, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims against defendants Costa, Cantu, Holmes, Covello, and Rojas. See ECF Nos 11 & 16. The court inadvertently failed to also recommend the dismissal of claims against defendant Coker. ///// /////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.