(PC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20232:21-cv-01909California4,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN MICHAEL VASKO, No. 2:21-cv-1909 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and he will be given an opportunity to amend the complaint. I. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.