Sanchez

Sanchez v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:19-cv-01545California3,147 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL R. SANCHEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01545-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Crystal R. Sanchez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Adjudication, ECF No. 83, which seeks resolution only “on the legal issue of whether [Defendant Deputy Daren D. Allbee’s (‘Allbee’)] decision to impound Plaintiff’s vehicle violated the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 13 of the California Constitution.” Pl.’s Mem. ISO Mot. Summ. Adjudication, ECF No. 83-1, at 4 (“Pl.’s Mem.”). Defendants Allbee, County of Sacramento, and Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the Motion. ECF No. 87 (“Defs.’ Opp’n”). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.