Sanchez
Sanchez v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL R. SANCHEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01545-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Crystal R. Sanchez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Adjudication, ECF No. 83, which seeks resolution only “on the legal issue of whether [Defendant Deputy Daren D. Allbee’s (‘Allbee’)] decision to impound Plaintiff’s vehicle violated the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 13 of the California Constitution.” Pl.’s Mem. ISO Mot. Summ. Adjudication, ECF No. 83-1, at 4 (“Pl.’s Mem.”). Defendants Allbee, County of Sacramento, and Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the Motion. ECF No. 87 (“Defs.’ Opp’n”). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs.…