Thompson

(HC) Wilson v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:21-cv-00793California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNELL EUGENE WILSON, JR., No. 2:21-cv-0793 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, FCI-HERLONG , Respondent. 16 On January 31, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Rule 4. Petitioner did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Id. Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.