(PC) Iseli v. State of CA (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:22-cv-01792California1,848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:22-cv-1792 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On February 6, 2023, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint that complies with the October 19, 2022 screening order. On February 16, 2023, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. As discussed below, plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.