Davis

(PC) Onley v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20232:22-cv-01795California389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNIE FRANKLIN ONLEY, No. 2:22-cv-01795-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D. DAVIS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2023, the court informed plaintiff that he could proceed with potentially cognizable due process claims against defendants Davis and Dohoda, a potentially cognizable Fourth Amendment claim against defendant Davis, and a potentially cognizable retaliation claim against defendant John Doe or he could file an amended complaint in an effort to also state additional claims, including claims against defendants Rocha, Kelly, and Anderson. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff initially elected to amend his complaint but subsequently notified the court or his intention to proceed only with the claims identified by the court. ECF Nos. 14 & 15. ///// 27 1 Plaintiff notes that he may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.