Kamen

(PC) Torres v. Kamen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20231:21-cv-01503California1,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL TORRES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01503-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

G. KAMEN, et al., COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

18 Plaintiff Miguel Torres is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 I. INTRODUCTION On January 26, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 15.) The Court found Plaintiff had stated cognizable deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Kamen, Castro, and Spaeth, but that Plaintiff had failed to state any other cognizable claim for relief. (Id. at 10-13.) As a result, Plaintiff was directed to do one of the following: (1) notify the Court in writing that he does not wish to file a first amended complaint and he is willing to proceed only on his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.