Flenory

Flenory v. Macy's, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20231:23-cv-00297California905 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANYA FLENORY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00297-JLT-SKO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CONCERNING Plaintiff, SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 13 v. (Doc. 1) MACY’S INC., a corporation; and MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, a limited liability company, 16 Defendants. On February 27, 2023, Tanya Flenory filed a complaint against Macy’s Inc. and Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC asserting four claims under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, California Government Code § 12940 et seq., and a related tort claim for constructive discharge. (Doc. 1 at 1.) Flenory asserts this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1332. (Id. at 2.) The burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction “rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994); see also Romero v. Securus Techs., Inc., 216 F. Supp. 3d 1078, 1085 (S.D. Cal. 2016) (“As the party putting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.