(PS) Valentine v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20232:22-cv-02238California830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESHAYLA VALENTINE, No. 2:22-cv-02238–DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

MOTION TO DISMISS

v. (ECF No. 7) SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

15 Defendant.

17 On December 15, 2022, defendant, the Social Security Administration, removed plaintiff’s state court civil action to this court.1 (ECF No. 1.) On January 5, 2023, defendant filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and set the hearing to take place on February 15, 2023. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff did not respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss. (See Id.) Accordingly, on February 7, 2023, the court vacated the hearing, cautioned plaintiff that a written response to the motion was required, and ordered plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, statement of non-opposition, or otherwise responded to the court order. This action should be dismissed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.