Segriest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON L. APODACA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01781-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE1

v. (Doc. No. 16) NANCY SEGRIEST, STEPHEN

HITCHMAN, EMMANUEL CONANAN, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

S. GATES, Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 16). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss the Second Amended Complaint because it fails to state any cognizable constitutional claim. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Plaintiff commenced this action while in prison and is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), which requires, inter alia, the court to screen any complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, its officers, or its employees before directing service upon any defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This requires the Court to identify any…