Clendenin

(PC) Felix v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20231:19-cv-01784California8,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:19-cv-01784-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. (ECF No. 1)

CLENDENIN, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. (ECF No. 45)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS (ECF No. 42)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

20 I. Introduction Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). As Plaintiff is a civil detainee and has paid the filing fee, he is not a prisoner or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.