(PC)Ramirez

(PC)Ramirez v. Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20231:23-cv-00162California2,182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISRAEL MALDONADO-RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00162-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

FRANCISCO ET AL., TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) 1 Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 (Doc. No. 2) 17 Plaintiff Israel Maldonado-Ramirez, a prisoner incarcerated at Madera County Jail, initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 2, 2023. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff seeks to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three actions or appeals that constitute strikes, and the Complaint does not establish that Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. ///…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.