Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20231:21-cv-01461California1,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM JAY STONE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. (ECF No. 78) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed February 27, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Anderson, B. Gonzales, G. Morales, and K. Gonzales. On October 19, 2022, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 48.) On November 22, 2022, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 59.) On January 19, 2023, Defendants filed a unopposed motion for a 33-day extension of time to serve discovery responses to Plaintiff’s interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions. (ECF No. 72.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.