Haddad

(PC) Casey v. Haddad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20231:21-cv-00855California1,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00855-ADA-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

HADDAD, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 12, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 19.) The Court determined Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim against any named defendant. (Id. at 6- 10.) Plaintiff was afforded 21 days within which to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order, or, alternatively, to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 10.) On January 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Refering [sic] to FIRST SCREENING ORDER.” (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff’s filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.