Fruit Royale, Inc. v. Exportadora Acograpes, Ltda.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20231:22-cv-01646California2,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRUIT ROYALE, INC., Case No. 1:22-cv-01646-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR

ISSUANCE OF LETTER ROGATORY

v. EXPORTADORA ACOGRAPES, LTDA. (Doc. 6)

Defendant. 16 17 On February 9, 2023, Plaintiff Fruit Royale, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion requesting the Court issue a letter rogatory pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1781 and the method set forth by the Inter- American Convention on Letter’s Rogatory and Additional Protocol (“IACAP”), Jan. 30, 1975, S. TREATY DOC. No. 27, 98th Cong. 2d Sess. (1984) to effectuate service on Defendant Exportadora Acograpes, Ltda. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 4).1 The Court issued an order denying without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of the requested letter rogatory on February 16, 2023. (Doc. 5). The Court found Plaintiff had completed the necessary forms (Form A and Form B) for service as set forth in the Additional Protocol. Id. at 2.

1 The matter of issuance of the requested letter rogatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.