Toste

Courthouse News Service v. Toste

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20231:21-cv-01790California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01790-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING THE

CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE

v. AMANDA TOSTE AS A DEFENDANT IN

THIS ACTION

AMANDA TOSTE, et al., (ECF No. 31) Defendants.

16 On March 1, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) as to the dismissal of Defendant Amanda Toste, in her official capacity as court executive officer/clerk of the Merced County Superior Court. (ECF No. 31.) The dismissal of this Defendant is with prejudice. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.