Ehlers

(PC) Miller v. Ehlers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20232:22-cv-01569California3,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-1569 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER EHLERS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated California law and acted in retaliation. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and her1 complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.