Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20231:21-cv-01800California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR STATUS IN HIS FILING

v. OF FEBRUARY 27, 2023

E. MUNOZ, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed an untitled document on February 27, 2023. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff notified the Court that he wished to proceed on the claims found cognizable by the Court in its First Screening Order, and also states he “file[d] 2# 1983 suits on the same day Earnest S. Harris v. I. Ceballos, I wrote to the Court’s clerk asking about both 1983 suits, I thought the Court merged the two 1983 suits.” (Id., underline in original.) Plaintiff notes the screening order does not mention “Earnest S. Harris v. I. Ceballos.” (Id., underline in original.) Plaintiff states he has “a copy of the 1983 suit 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.