Bobbla

(PC) Davis v. Bobbla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20232:22-cv-01658California3,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, AKA No. 2:22-cv-1658 TLN DB P

MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS-ROGERS,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

MANJALA BOBBLA,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, request for the appointment of counsel, and his complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the request to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.