Campbell

(PC) Rogers v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20231:21-cv-00021California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. ROGERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00021-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS

K. CAMPBELL, et al., Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Charles A. Rogers is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 31, 2023, this Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 15.) The Court found Plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated a cognizable First Amendment claim against Defendant K. Campbell but failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief against any other Defendant. (Id. at 9-17.) Plaintiff was given 21 days to elect one of the following options: (1) file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order; (2) notify the Court of his willingness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.