Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20231:21-cv-01800California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS

E. MUNOZ, et al., Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 10, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 8.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint plausibly states the following cognizable claims: (1) Eighth Amendment excessive force against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; (2) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendant Romero; (3) First Amendment retaliation against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; and (4) a due process violation for a false rules violation report against Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.