Joseph

(PC) Richard v. Joseph

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20232:21-cv-00975California11,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRAIG RICHARD, No. 2: 21-cv-0975 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOSEPH, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment, defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply and plaintiff’s motion for clarification, construed as a request for reconsideration. (ECF Nos. 62, 65, 71, 77.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply be granted, and plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment and clarification, construed as a request for reconsideration, be denied. II. Legal Standards for Summary Judgment Summary judgment is appropriate when it is demonstrated that the standard set forth in Federal Rule of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.