McGeffen

(PC) Hill v. McGeffen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20232:22-cv-01524California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, Case No. 2:22-cv-01524-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

McGEFFEN, et al., ECF No. 2 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Cymeyon Hill is a civil detainee proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. With his complaint, he filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, attesting that he is not employed, has not received any money in the last twelve months, and has no money or assets. ECF No. 2 at 1-2. A subsequently filed trust account statement showed plaintiff’s balance to be $4,656. ECF No. 7. After reviewing plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and his trust fund statement, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 10. In response, plaintiff neither provided information about his finances nor stated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.