Sylvan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL HURTADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-00888-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDERS

SYLVAN, ECF No. 17 Defendant.

16 On February 1, 2023, I issued an order setting an initial scheduling conference for March 9, 2023, and directing the parties to file status reports by no later than February 23, 2023. ECF No. 17. Defendant timely submitted a status report. Plaintiff, however, failed to file his own status report. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary…