Norton

Norton v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20231:22-cv-00328California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAYLE NORTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00328-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 14, 15) 15 On February 9, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (ECF No. 14.) In the stipulation of dismissal, the parties seek to dismiss the action with prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs, “provided that the Court retain ancillary jurisdiction for enforcement of the Settlement Agreement between the Parties in its Order.” (ECF No. 14 at 2.) On February 10, 2023, the Court issued an order denying without prejudice the parties’ stipulated request for the Court to retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and notified the parties it would direct the Clerk 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.