(PC) Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20232:22-cv-02249California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH MILLER, No. 2: 22-cv-2249 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed January 20, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 On January 27, 2023, plaintiff filed the Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.