Pallares

(HC) Omega v. Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20232:22-cv-00178California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NALANA OMEGA, No. 2:22-cv-00178-KJM-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER MICHAEL PALLARES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Nalana Omega, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 28, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 ///// ///// 26 1 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.