(PC) Ricalls v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20232:22-cv-02322California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LEONARD RICALLS, No. 2:22-cv-2322 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND R. SMITH, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that he maintains a plant-based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.