McComber

(PC) Wheaton v. McComber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20232:22-cv-01434California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENE PAUL WHEATON, Case No. 2:22-cv-01434-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) STAND BY HER SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT SUBJECT

J. MCCOMBER et al., TO A RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL;

Defendants. (2) FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 13 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this section 1983 case against four defendants at CSP- Sacramento. ECF No. 13 at 2. Her allegations are insufficiently plead, however. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity to amend before recommending that this action be dismissed. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.