Herrera

(PC) Garcia v. Herrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20232:22-cv-01612California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO GARCIA, No. 2:22-cv-1612 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LINDA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, the motion will be granted and the amended complaint filed by plaintiff on December 23, 2022 will be deemed timely. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.